Court rules against GLC

2019-09-18T12:58:45+00:00 September 19th, 2019|

The Constitutional Court dismissed, without costs, the application for leave to appeal by the Greater Lonmin Community (GLC), in which the GLC sought to essentially set aside the acquisition of Lonmin by Sibanye-Stillwater.

The Constitutional Court ruled in favour of Sibanye Stillwater. Image credit: Pixabay

The Constitutional Court ruled in favour of Sibanye Stillwater. Image credit: Pixabay

“We are extremely pleased with the judgment made by the Con Court today, which supports our view that the GLC’s claims had been properly dealt with before by the Competition Appeal Court and the Competition Tribunal and were frivolous,” comments Neal Froneman, Sibanye Stillwater CEO.

According to the judgement, the application for leave to appeal bore no reasonable prospects of success and dismissed the application for direct access as the GLC had not made a case that was sufficiently in the interests of justice for it to be heard directly by the Con Court. “It is unfortunate that certain stakeholders seem unable to recognise the plight that faced the Lonmin operations and, instead of engaging with us, continue to pursue spurious and expensive legal alternatives,” he adds.

The effect of the Con Court order is that the judgment of the Competition Appeal Court (which, in essence, endorsed the judgment of the Competition Tribunal) remains in force – bringing an end to all proceedings. “We are sensitive to the needs of our communities and remain committed to ongoing engagement and to delivering on Lonmin’s Social and Labour Plan commitments as recorded in the conditions handed down by the Competition Tribunal and reiterated by the Competition Appeal Court,” Froneman concludes.